A dressing-down
The following letter was originally published in the Gazette:
"Dear Editor,
The existing distinction in court dress between solicitor-advocates and barristers is ridiculous.
This penalises both solicitors and - more importantly - their clients.
Obviously solicitor-advocates should be allowed to wear wigs without further delay.
However, a subtle difference in the design of the wigs may still be appropriate to enable those in the legal profession to recognise the distinction in status.
I would suggest that, rather than being made from horsehair, solicitor-advocates' wigs should be made from nylon.
And be orange.
Simon Gibbs, barrister (non-practising)"
"Dear Editor,
The existing distinction in court dress between solicitor-advocates and barristers is ridiculous.
This penalises both solicitors and - more importantly - their clients.
Obviously solicitor-advocates should be allowed to wear wigs without further delay.
However, a subtle difference in the design of the wigs may still be appropriate to enable those in the legal profession to recognise the distinction in status.
I would suggest that, rather than being made from horsehair, solicitor-advocates' wigs should be made from nylon.
And be orange.
Simon Gibbs, barrister (non-practising)"
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home